In the field of clinical and health psychology, many classic psychological effects profoundly affect the diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation process of the disease. These effects not only reveal the close connection between psychology and physiology, but also provide medical staff with important ideas for optimizing diagnosis and treatment plans. Whether it is the doctor's diagnostic label of the patient, the patient's blood pressure changes in the clinic, or the expectations and trust during the treatment process, there are psychological laws that can be explained and applied behind it. This article will analyze in detail the eight common effects in clinical and health psychology, helping readers to fully understand the definition, principles, applications and critical significance of these effects.
Labeling effect: defined 'illness' and changes in self-cognition
What is the label effect?
The labeling effect refers to the phenomenon that when an individual is labeled with a certain 'label' (such as disease diagnosis, psychological characteristics description, etc.), he will unconsciously adjust his behavior and cognition according to the characteristics defined by the label, and even strengthen related symptoms. In clinical scenarios, it is often manifested as a change in the patient's perception and attitude towards life after learning the diagnosis.
Background and core principles
The theoretical basis of the label effect originates from the 'label theory' of social psychology, proposed by sociologist Becker and others. The theory believes that society's 'labeling' of individuals will shape their self-identity - when patients are labeled as 'depression' and 'anxiety', they may internalize these definitions, believing that they are 'easy to be depressed' and 'unable to cope with stress', and then pay more attention to negative feelings in life, forming a vicious cycle.
Experimental basis
The most classic case is the 'fake patient experiment' by psychologist Luo Senhan: researchers disguised as 'auditative patients' and entered a mental hospital. Once labeled as 'psychotic patients', their normal behavior (such as taking notes) was interpreted by medical staff as 'psychotic symptoms'. This experiment intuitively demonstrates how diagnostic tags affect others' perception of individuals, and indirectly affect individual self-cognition.
Realistic application
In clinical diagnosis, doctors should pay attention to the 'artistic nature of labels': they should not only clarify the diagnosis to formulate treatment plans, but also avoid overemphasizing disease labels. For example, telling patients that “you currently have symptoms of anxiety” rather than “you are a patient with anxiety”, while emphasizing that “symptoms can be improved through adjustments” to help patients build positive cognition.
Critical Analysis
The labeling effect is a 'double-edged sword': clear diagnostic tags can help patients understand their own status and obtain targeted treatment, but may also bring about 'shaming' or self-restriction. Therefore, in clinical practice, it is necessary to balance the accuracy of diagnosis and protect the patient's psychology to avoid labeling becoming an obstacle to recovery.
Medical student syndrome: 'Self-diagnostic anxiety' brought by knowledge
What is the Medical Student Syndrome Effect?
The syndrome effect of medical students refers to the phenomenon that medical students or medical beginners are prone to correspond their physical feelings with the symptoms of the disease they have learned when learning disease knowledge, and then suspect that they have suffered from the corresponding disease. It is also called the 'medical school illusion'.
Background and core principles
This effect is generally present in the early stages of knowledge learning, and the core principles are 'selective attention' and 'self-attribute bias'. When medical students learn about diseases, they will be highly sensitive to related symptoms. For example, when learning that 'lung cancer may have cough symptoms', they will pay special attention to their occasional cough and tend to attribute it to serious diseases rather than common colds or dry air. In addition, beginners’ lack of understanding of the probability of disease will also amplify this anxiety.
Realistic application
In response to this effect, medical schools often help students distinguish 'normal physiological phenomena' from 'disease symptoms' through case teaching, emphasizing that 'symptoms need to be comprehensively judged based on medical history and examination results.' At the same time, guide students to learn stress management skills to avoid excessive self-doubt affecting their study and life.
Critical Analysis
The medical student syndrome effect is essentially a normal cognitive bias in the learning process, not a real psychological disease. Moderate vigilance can encourage students to learn knowledge more seriously, but excessive anxiety may lead to 'sorthologic symptoms' - headaches, insomnia, etc. caused by psychological tension, which will affect health. Therefore, learners need to establish 'probability thinking' and understand that 'a single symptom rarely diagnoses a disease.'
Placebo effect (Placebo): the expected 'healing power'
What is the placebo effect?
The placebo effect refers to the phenomenon that the patient can relieve symptoms only because of the psychological expectation of 'believing that the treatment is effective' after receiving interventions without actual therapeutic effects (such as saline injections, sugar pills, etc.).
Background and core principles
The history of the placebo effect can be traced back to ancient 'talisman therapy', but its scientific research began in the 20th century. The core principle is that psychological expectations affect physiological functions through the neuroendocrine system: when patients believe that treatment is effective, the brain releases endorphins (natural painkiller), dopamine (reward hormone), etc., to regulate immune responses and pain perception, thereby producing a 'therapeutic effect.'
Experimental basis
Classic double-blind experiments often observe placebo effects: in pain treatment studies, patients were randomly divided into 'real medicine group' and 'placebo group', and the grouping was not informed. As a result, about 30% of patients in the placebo group reported pain relief. The study also found that the more formal the 'form' of placebo (such as the injection is stronger than oral effect), the higher the patient's trust in the doctor, the more obvious the effect.
Realistic application
The placebo effect is rationally used in clinical practice: For example, in diseases such as chronic pain and insomnia, doctors may combine placebo (such as 'this is an auxiliary drug to relieve discomfort') with psychological counseling to enhance patients' confidence in treatment. In addition, in the development of new drugs, the placebo effect is an important reference for judging the true efficacy of a drug - it can only be considered effective if the drug effect significantly exceeds the placebo.
Critical Analysis
The effectiveness of the placebo effect depends on “deception” (the patient does not know it is a placebo), which has sparked ethical controversy: Should patients be “deception” for relief? The current consensus is that it is necessary to use it with caution based on the patient's informed consent, and it cannot replace regular treatment. Especially for organic diseases (such as cancer and diabetes), placebo cannot cure the cause.
Anti-placebo effect (Nocebo): 'destructive power' of negative expectations
What is the anti-placebo effect?
The anti-placebo effect is contrary to the placebo effect, which refers to the phenomenon that the patient actually has adverse reactions or worsening symptoms due to 'expecting treatment to have side effects' or 'believe that he will worsen his condition'.
Background and core principles
At the heart of the anti-placebo effect, negative expectations activate the body's stress response: when a patient is told that 'drugs may cause headaches' or sees side effects in other patients, the brain triggers sympathetic excitement, releases cortisol (stress hormone), which in turn causes physiological reactions such as headache, nausea, and increased blood pressure.
Experimental basis
Studies show that if the doctor told the patient that 'a 20% chance of causing nausea in a certain treatment', about 30% of the patients will actually develop nausea symptoms, which is much higher than the control group that was not told. In another study, some patients were hinted at “this medical device may cause you to hurt” and even if the device was not activated, these patients reported obvious pain.
Realistic application
The anti-placebo effect reminds medical staff to pay attention to 'communication methods': when informing the treatment risks, excessive emphasis should be avoided, and positive language such as 'most people will not experience serious discomfort' can be used to reduce patients' negative expectations. At the same time, create a relaxed medical environment and reduce the tension among patients.
Critical Analysis
The anti-placebo effect warns us that 'verbal violence' in doctor-patient communication may hurt people more than the side effects of drugs. But it is not completely negative either - understanding this effect can help doctors more accurately determine whether the symptoms are side effects of the treatment itself or caused by the patient's psychological suggestion, and avoid misjudging the treatment effect.
White-coat hypertension: 'Blood pressure abnormality' in the clinic
What is the effect of hypertension in white coats?
The effect of hypertension in white coats refers to the phenomenon that some patients have temporary increase in blood pressure due to seeing medical staff ('white coat') in medical environments such as hospitals or clinics, but their blood pressure is normal in daily life.
Background and core principles
This effect is essentially a 'environmental stress response': the medical environment is unfamiliar and stressful to some people, and will activate the sympathetic nervous system ('fight-flight' reaction), causing the heart to rise, blood vessels to contract, and thus increase blood pressure. Studies have shown that about 10%-30% of patients with hypertension are suspected to have this phenomenon.
Experimental basis
Dynamic blood pressure monitoring technology confirmed this effect: patients were asked to wear a 24-hour blood pressure monitor, and compared the clinic blood pressure and daily blood pressure, it was found that the clinic systolic blood pressure of patients with white coats was 10-20mmHg higher than daily life, while the diastolic blood pressure was 5-10mmHg higher.
Realistic application
In clinical practice, doctors will distinguish white coat hypertension from real hypertension through dynamic blood pressure monitoring or home blood pressure measurement, avoiding overdiagnosis and unnecessary medication. At the same time, it is recommended that patients relax before the diagnosis: arrive at the clinic in advance for 15 minutes to rest, and avoid taking blood pressure immediately after rushing.
Critical Analysis
Although hypertension in white coats is not 'real hypertension', it also needs attention: studies have found that people who have this effect for a long time have a slightly higher risk of developing persistent hypertension in the future than ordinary people. Therefore, this type of patients needs to monitor their blood pressure regularly and maintain a healthy lifestyle (such as low-salt diet and regular exercise).
Habituation in exposure therapy: Face fear directly, anxiety decreases
What is the exposure-habitization effect?
The exposure-habitization effect is the core principle in behavioral therapy, which refers to the phenomenon that allows patients to repeatedly and safely contact stimuli that trigger anxiety or fear (such as phobia patients contact phobia objects). As the number of exposure increases, the anxiety response will gradually weaken or even disappear.
Background and core principles
This effect originates from the 'classical conditioned reflex' theory: fear is often acquired (such as a dog bite experience that leads to dog fear), and exposure therapy breaks the fear association through 'deconditioning'. The core principle is 'habitization' - when the stimulus persists and does not cause real harm, the brain will gradually adapt to reduce the release of anxiety signals; at the same time, patients learn to 'be able to cope with fear' during exposure and enhance their sense of control.
Experimental basis
In the phobia treatment study, patients who are afraid of snakes first look at the snake's pictures, and then gradually come into contact with the real snake (in a safe environment), 3 times a week, for 30 minutes each time. After 4 weeks, the patient's anxiety physiological reactions such as heart rate and sweating were significantly reduced, and the effect could last for more than 6 months. This suggests that the exposure-habitization effect has long-term stability.
Realistic application
The exposure-habitization effect is widely used in the treatment of anxiety disorders (such as phobia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder). For example, for people with social phobia, the therapist will guide them to start with a “short conversation with acquaintances” and gradually transition to “speaking in groups”, and adapting the patient to social scenarios through repeated practice.
Critical Analysis
Exposure therapy needs to be 'gradually advanced'. If the intensity of exposure exceeds the patient's tolerance, fear may be aggravated. Therefore, during treatment, the exposure rhythm needs to be adjusted according to the patient's anxiety level, and at the same time, relaxation training (such as deep breathing) should be combined to help the patient cope with discomfort during the process.
Common factors effect: the 'common force' behind different therapies
What is the common factor effect?
The common factor effect refers to the fact that different psychotherapy methods (such as cognitive behavioral therapy, psychodynamic therapy, and humanistic therapy) can all produce effects because they do not rely on their own unique technologies, but because of some of the core elements they share.
Background and core principles
This concept was proposed by psychologist Rosenzweig, who found through research that the effects of different therapies are much smaller than people expect. The core common elements include: the relationship of trust between the therapist and the patient (“therapeutic alliance”), the patient’s expectations for treatment, obtaining emotional support and understanding, learning new coping skills, and having the opportunity to express inner pain. These elements work together to help patients improve their mental state.
Experimental basis
A meta-analysis of depression treatment showed that there was no significant difference in the overall effects of cognitive behavioral therapy, interpersonal therapy, and supportive psychotherapy, and about 60% of the effects can be attributed to common factors, and only 40% were related to specific techniques of each therapy.
Realistic application
The effect of common factors suggests that 'relationships are greater than technology' in psychotherapy: therapists need to prioritize the establishment of trusted and sincere therapeutic relationships rather than relying solely on a certain technology. For example, even if different therapies are used, the effect can be improved by allowing the patient to feel “understood” and “supported” and believe that treatment can bring about changes.
Critical Analysis
Emphasizing common elements does not negate the value of specific technologies—targeted technologies are still indispensable for specific issues (such as exposure and response-blocking technologies for obsessive-compulsive disorder). Only by combining common elements and specific technologies can the best therapeutic effect be achieved.
Expectancy in psychology: Believe in the power of “becoming better”
What is the treatment expectation effect?
The treatment expectation effect refers to the patient's expectations of the treatment effect that directly affects the actual treatment results: the more the patient believes that treatment can help him, the better the treatment effect is; on the contrary, if he is skeptical about the treatment, the effect may be greatly reduced.
Background and core principles
This effect is similar to the placebo effect, but emphasizes the role of 'active expectation' in psychotherapy. The core principle is that expectations will affect the patient's 'investment': high expectations patients are more willing to cooperate with treatment (such as completing homework and insisting on consultation), and are more likely to pay attention to positive changes in life, forming a virtuous cycle of 'expectations → efforts → improvement → higher expectations'.
Experimental basis
The study found that before the start of psychotherapy, patients were asked to fill out the 'confidence score for treatment effect'. Patients with high scores improved their symptoms after 12 weeks of treatment, about 40% higher than those with low scores. Even with the same treatment regimen, the patient's subjective expectations can significantly affect the final effect.
Realistic application
During treatment, doctors or consultants will improve the patient's treatment expectations through the following methods: clearly explain the treatment principles ('This method has helped many people with similar situations'), share successful cases (on the premise of protecting privacy), and set reasonable stage goals ('Try to improve sleep first, and then gradually adjust your mood'), so that patients can see the possibility of change.
Critical Analysis
Treatment expectations need to be 'based on reality': excessive commitment (such as 'complete recovery with 10 treatments') may cause the patient to be disappointed and give up because he did not meet his expectations; and reasonable expectations should be combined with objective factors such as the severity of the problem and the treatment cycle, which not only gives hope but also avoids unrealistic fantasies.
Summarize
Through the analysis of these clinical and health psychological effects, we can see more clearly the important role of psychological factors in disease diagnosis and treatment. Whether it is the impact of labels during diagnosis, the expected power in treatment, or the habitual laws in rehabilitation, it reminds medical staff and patients that only by paying attention to the interaction between psychology and physiology can we achieve more accurate and effective health management.
Continue to pay attention to the 'Complete Psychological Effects' series of articles and explore more secret weapons of psychology in depth.
Link to this article: https://m.psyctest.cn/article/l8xOD2dw/
If the original article is reprinted, please indicate the author and the source in the form of this link.
