In our daily lives, the concept of time and self-control almost determine how we set goals, plan our future, and resist temptations. Whether it is to decide to exercise today or 'to talk about it tomorrow', or when facing the choice of instant pleasure and long-term benefits, psychological research reveals the cognitive mechanism behind it. These mechanisms are not simply 'strong willpower' issues, but rather cognitive biases and decision-making patterns embedded in the human brain.
This article will systematically and in-depth analysis of four psychological effects closely related to 'time and self-control':
- Delay Discounting
- Present Bias
- Hot-cold Empathy Gap
- Affective Forecasting Error
Understanding these psychological effects will not only help us master more scientific methods of self-control, but also play a huge value in the fields of education, finance, health management, etc.
Delay Discounting
What is the delay discount effect?
The delay discount effect refers to the rewards people have for delays, which often psychologically 'discounts' , that is, the more we need to wait, the lower the value of the reward in our hearts. For example:
Now give you 100 yuan, or 120 yuan in a month, most people will choose to get 100 yuan immediately. This is not because 120 yuan is not worth it, but the waiting process weakens our perceived value of rewards.
Background and source
The concept was first systematically studied by psychologist George Ainslie in the 1970s, and originated from the intersection of behavioral economics and experimental psychology. Early experiments were mostly based on the behavioral patterns of animals (such as pigeons and mice) when choosing instant food and delaying food rewards, and later gradually expanded to the field of human decision-making.
Core Principle
Mathematical model of delay discount effect commonly used hyperbolic discount model (Hyperbolic Discounting) description:
Value = Actual Reward/ (1 + k × Delay Time)
where k represents the individual's sensitivity to delay, and the greater the k, the more likely it is to be satisfied instantly.
Experimental basis
- Mazur (1987) animal experiments show that animals tend to choose instant rewards even if the delay is only a few seconds.
- Kirby & Maraković (1996) found in human experiments that financial status, age, and impulsive personality traits all affect the delayed discount rate.
Realistic application
- Financial Management and Investment : The delayed discount effect explains why many people have difficulty sticking to long-term investment plans.
- Healthy behaviors : dieting, quitting smoking, fitness and other behaviors that require long-term efforts are easily replaced by short-term pleasures.
- Educational intervention : By setting up intermediate reward nodes to reduce waiting costs, the possibility of delayed gratification can be increased.
Critical Analysis
Although the delay discount effect holds in most experiments, the weakening effect of delay on value is not significant in goals with extremely high emotional value (such as getting married and meeting relatives). In addition, differences in cultural background and time concepts will also significantly affect the degree of delay discounts, indicating that this effect is not universally applicable.
Present Bias
What is the current bias effect?
The current bias effect refers to people over-preferring instant rewards when making decisions and underestimating the value of future rewards. Similar to the delay discount effect, but the current error emphasizes the special attraction of the current moment - once the reward becomes 'received immediately', our decision-making balance will be seriously tilted.
Background and source
This effect stems from Time Inconsistency research in behavioral economics, especially Richard Thaler's research. In his 1981 experiment, he found that people show inconsistent preference changes when facing choices at different time points.
Core Principle
The main difference between the current bias effect and the delay discount effect is:
- Delay discounts are 'gradual reduction in value over time'
- Current error is a leap in value at the 'current moment', similar to the steep change in the decision curve at the zero delay point.
Experimental basis
- Laibson (1997) found through economic models that current misunderstandings will lead to a decline in savings rate and insufficient health investment.
- Psychological experiments show that even if the time difference and amount difference between the two rewards are the same, if one party is 'get it immediately', people prefer it.
Realistic application
- Consumption behavior : Credit card installment, buying first and paying later services take advantage of the current biased mentality.
- Policy formulation : Tax preferential treatment or instant cashback incentives can effectively promote behavioral change.
- Task management : converting the future reward part into instant feedback can significantly improve execution.
Critical Analysis
Current bias assumes that humans are short-sighted , but in some scenarios, immediate choice is not irrational, such as immediate response in response to an emergency threat is a survival strategy. In addition, the advocacy of 'act immediately' in some cultures will also blur the boundaries between current bias and reasonable instant decision-making.
Hot-cold Empathy Gap
What is the hot and cold empathy gap effect?
The hot and cold empathy gap effect was proposed by behavioral economist George Loewenstein, which means that people cannot accurately predict their behavior in the 'emotional state' (hot state) and vice versa. For example, you swear to get up early tomorrow to exercise when you calm down, but the sleepiness of the alarm clock ringing in the morning makes you turn off the alarm directly.
Background and source
At the end of the 20th century, Loewenstein and others found that human impulses, desires, fears, etc. in hot states will significantly change the decision-making pattern, and the prediction error between this state switch is the core of the hot and cold empathy gap.
Core Principle
The gap in hot and cold empathy comes from the penetration of emotional state into the cognitive assessment system. The brain in the cold state relies more on rational calculations, while in the hot state it is dominated by emotional and physiological reactions. This state switching has left a huge gap between human beings in making plans and actually implementing them.
Experimental basis
- Participants in hunger tend to choose high-calorie foods, even if they claim to choose healthy foods when they are full.
- In pain, anger, or fear, individuals make decisions that are very different from those when calm.
Realistic application
- Health management : Make a diet plan in a cold state in advance, which can reduce hot impulsive diet.
- Emotional regulation : Training to identify emotional state changes, helps reduce impulse consumption and excessive behaviors.
- Law and security : Behaviors in high-pressure environments often do not match their usual expectations, and the judicial system needs to consider this.
Critical Analysis
This effect is easily overgeneralized. In reality, some people have strong emotional prediction capabilities and can make more accurate hot decisions in cold states. In addition, the accumulation of cultural and personal experience can partially narrow the gap in hot and cold empathy.
Affective Forecasting Error
What is the self-predictive bias effect?
The self-predictive bias effect refers to the fact that people often overestimate the intensity and duration of events on their emotions when predicting future emotional reactions. For example, the excitement of getting into an ideal school is usually shorter than expected, and the sadness of unemployment often fades faster than expected.
Background and source
Research by psychologists Daniel Gilbert and Timothy Wilson in the 1990s systematically revealed this effect for the first time, emphasizing the two sub-phenomenons of 'Impact Bias' and 'Durability Bias'.
Core Principle
This deviation is due to two major reasons:
- Focusing on illusion : Over-focus on the event itself and ignore other emotional regulators in daily life.
- Psychological immune system : Humans have the ability to self-regulate emotions and will unconsciously adapt to positive or negative events.
Experimental basis
- College students predict that they will suffer extremely after breaking up in love, but the actual emotional recovery speed is far beyond the prediction.
- The happiness level of lottery winners is not significantly different from that of ordinary people after one year.
Realistic application
- Career Planning : Avoid over-reliance on emotional predictions when making major career choices.
- Consumption decisions : Avoid excessive consumption due to expected happiness.
- Psychological intervention : Helps depressed patients recognize the resilience of emotions.
Critical Analysis
The self-predictive bias effect is not applicable to all emotions, and some major trauma (such as loss of a loved one) can lead to long-term emotional impacts. In addition, differences in emotional expression and regulation mechanisms in different cultures will also affect the size of prediction errors.
Summarize
The cognitive psychological effects related to 'time and self-control' - delay discount effect, current error effect, hot and cold empathy gap effect, and self-predictive bias effect, jointly reveal why we lose our minds when facing immediate temptation, or create a gap between planning and execution.
Understanding these psychological effects not only helps us arrange our time and energy more scientifically, but also provides a solid psychological basis in education, health, financial planning and policy making.
Continue to pay attention to the series of articles in 'Complete Psychological Effects' and explore more secret weapons of psychology in depth.
Link to this article: https://m.psyctest.cn/article/egdQ4Lxb/
If the original article is reprinted, please indicate the author and the source in the form of this link.
