In our daily lives, the environment affects our emotions, behaviors and decisions all the time. Whether it is neat streets, green parks, crowded cars and messy rooms, these environmental details play a role in subtle influence. Environmental psychology, as a discipline that studies the interaction between humans and the environment, reveals many interesting psychological laws - which we often call 'psychological effects'. This article will introduce the classic effects in environmental psychology in detail, and will take you through how the environment shapes behavior and how we use these laws to improve our lives.
Break window effect
What is the broken window effect?
The broken window effect refers to the phenomenon that tiny disordered signals in the environment will cause more bad behavior. If a window in a building is broken and not repaired in time, more windows will soon be broken; if a small amount of garbage appears on the street and not cleaned up, more garbage will accumulate soon. This chain reaction of 'disorder triggers even more disorder' is the core manifestation of the breaking window effect.
Background source
The broken window effect was proposed by American political scientist James Wilson and criminologist George Kelly in 1982 in the Atlantic Monthly. By observing urban crime, they found that minor environmental chaos (such as graffiti, homeless beggars, illegal parking) would send a signal of 'lack of management here', and thus condone more serious criminal behaviors. This theory was originally used to explain the reasons for the rise in urban crime rates, and was later widely used in areas such as environmental management and social governance.
Core Principle
The core principle of the broken window effect is the suggestive effect of environmental signals on behavior. An orderly environment will send signals that 'rules are followed' and 'behaviors are restricted', which will make people unconsciously regulate their behavior; while an disorderly environment will send signals that 'rules are invalid' and 'unsupervised', which will reduce people's sense of self-discipline and even induce speculative psychology - 'Since there is already chaos, it doesn't matter if there is a little more.' This psychological suggestion will form a vicious cycle, which will continuously escalate environmental problems and bad behaviors.
Experimental basis
The most classic verification experiment comes from the psychologist Philip Zimbardo's 'Abandoned Car Experiment' in 1969. He parked two identical used cars in middle-class and poor neighborhoods, removed his license plate and opened the hood. Cars in poor neighborhoods were destroyed within hours, while cars in middle-class neighborhoods were initially intact. But after Zimbado personally broke a window of a middle-class community car, the car was severely damaged and even parts were dismantled and stolen. Experiments have proved that the tiny disordered signal of 'breaking the window' will directly trigger more destructive behaviors.
Realistic application
The broken window effect is widely used in urban management. Many cities prevent greater chaos by 'fixing small problems in time': for example, street cleaning staff in Singapore will clean up garbage within 20 minutes, and subway staff in Tokyo will immediately repair scratches on the platform. These measures have effectively curbed the chain reaction of environmental deterioration. In the field of education, neat arrangement of classrooms can also reduce students' troubles, because an orderly environment will imply that 'the rules need to be followed here.'
Critical Analysis
The broken window effect is not an absolute truth, its intensity will be affected by social and cultural differences. In collectivist culture, people are more sensitive to environmental disorder, and the breaking window effect may be more obvious; while in cultures that emphasize individual freedom, the influence of environmental signals may be weak. In addition, excessive dependence on the breaking window effect may lead to 'environmental determinism' that ignores the individual's subjective initiative - even in disorderly environments, many people will stick to normative behavior. Therefore, when applying this effect, it is necessary to combine social background and humanistic care to avoid falling into the misunderstanding of 'only focusing on the clean environment and ignoring deep-seated problems'.
Environmental restorative effect
What is the environmental restorative effect?
Environmental restorative effects refer to the phenomenon that the natural environment (or a simulated natural environment) can relieve psychological fatigue and improve attention and emotional state. When we are in high-pressure work or study for a long time, we will feel mentally exhausted and inattentive. When we walk into parks, forests, or see green plants, we often feel relaxed and energy recovery. The role of this 'natural healing' is the embodiment of the environmental restorative effect.
Background source
The theoretical basis of this effect comes from the 'attention recovery theory (ART)' proposed by American psychologists Rachel Kaplan and Stephen Kaplan. In the 1980s, they conducted research on the common 'directed attention fatigue' (fatigue caused by long-term concentration) in modern society and found that the natural environment has a unique recovery function, while artificial environments in cities (such as tall buildings and traffic congestion areas) may aggravate fatigue.
Core Principle
The Kaplans believe that the recovery effect of the natural environment comes from four key characteristics: distantness (temporarily disengages stressors such as work), attraction (the beauty of the natural landscape will automatically attract attention without proactive efforts), ductility (the natural environment has rich details, making people willing to explore in depth), and compatibility (the environment matches personal goals, such as walking in the park can meet the relaxation needs). These four characteristics work together to switch the brain from 'active attention consumption' to 'passive attention recovery' state, thereby repairing psychological fatigue.
Experimental basis
Several experiments have verified the existence of environmental restorative effects. In a classic experiment, the researchers asked two groups of subjects to complete tasks that required high concentration (such as memorizing numbers), causing them to develop directional attention fatigue. Subsequently, one group of subjects watched pictures of natural landscapes and another group watched pictures of urban architecture. The results showed that subjects who watched the natural picture performed significantly better on subsequent attention tests and also had lower heart rate and stress hormone levels. Another field experiment found that people who walked in the forest for 90 minutes had significantly less activity in the stress-related areas of the brain and had more positive emotional scores than those who walked in the city.
Realistic application
Environmental restorative effects have been widely used in medical, educational and office design. Many hospitals will plant green plants or set up roof gardens outside the ward windows to help patients relieve anxiety and speed up recovery; schools add lawns and trees to campus planning can improve students' classroom attention and learning efficiency; offices introduce potted plants, natural-style murals or simulate natural light to reduce employees' work fatigue. Even in interior design, the popularity of the concept of 'bio-affinity design' stems from this effect - making the space more resilient by incorporating natural elements.
Critical Analysis
Although the environmental restorative effect has been supported by a large number of experiments, it also has certain limitations. First, not all natural environments have a recovery effect, such as the chaotic wilderness or natural environment in extreme weather may bring stress; second, individual differences will affect the intensity of the effect, people who like outdoor activities are more sensitive to the natural environment, while those who prefer urban life may get a weaker sense of recovery from nature. In addition, excessive reliance on the “natural environment” may ignore the role of other modes of recovery (such as rest, socializing). Therefore, when applying, it is necessary to combine specific scenarios and individual needs to avoid absoluteizing the role of the natural environment.
Environmental load effect
What is the environmental load effect?
Environmental load effect refers to the phenomenon that when the number of stimuli in the environment is too large and the intensity is too large, it will exceed the person's information processing ability, resulting in a decrease in behavioral efficiency, emotional irritability or even retreat. For example, in crowded and harsh shopping malls, we may end our shopping in a hurry; in streets with dense billboards and constant whistle, we may feel more likely to feel anxious, which are manifestations of excessive environmental load.
Background source
The theoretical basis of this effect is the 'urban overload theory' proposed by social psychologist Stanley Milgram. In the 1970s, Milgram studied the behavior of residents in big cities such as New York and found that high population density, noise, visual stimulation, etc. in urban environments would form 'environmental load'. When the load exceeds the individual's ability to bear, people would 'protect themselves' by reducing social interaction and shortening residence time.
Core Principle
The core of the environmental load effect is the imbalance between stimulus input and processing capacity. Everyone's brain has a certain amount of information processing capacity. When there are too many stimuli in the environment (such as sound, vision, and crowd interaction), the brain needs to consume more energy to filter irrelevant information, resulting in a decrease in attention resources for target tasks. At this time, people will show 'defensive reactions': such as reducing their willingness to help others (because they don't have the energy to pay attention to others' needs), increasing the rate of decision-making errors (because information screening is difficult), and aversion behavior (leave the high-load environment as soon as possible).
Experimental basis
The 'Noise and Helpful Behavior Experiment' by psychologist Robert Barron verified this effect. He asked the subject to complete the task in a quiet or noisy environment (playing construction noise), during which he arranged a 'help seeker' to pretend to fall. The results showed that 70% of subjects in quiet environments would actively provide help, while only 30% of people in noisy environments were willing to help. Another experiment found that on streets with dense billboards, pedestrians' answers to road questions were 25% lower than on simple streets because too much visual stimulation interfered with information memory.
Realistic application
The environmental load effect provides an important reference for public space design. The mall reduces shopping load by controlling the volume of background music and reasonably planning the flow route (reducing crowding) and increases customer stay time; the airport sets up quiet corners in the waiting area to help passengers relieve noise and fatigue caused by crowds; the school simplifies the decoration of the classroom to avoid too many posters and pendants distracting students. In addition, in product design, the popularity of the 'minimalist' style also stems from the avoidance of environmental loads - reducing redundant functions and visual elements, making it easier for users to operate.
Critical Analysis
The intensity of the environmental load effect is not fixed, it is affected by the individual's adaptability and the nature of the task. People who live in cities for a long time are more tolerant of high-load environments, while rural residents may be more sensitive; simple tasks (such as walking) are more tolerant of load than complex tasks (such as reading). In addition, moderate environmental load is not all negatively affected - for example, the lively atmosphere of the festival market is pleasant, not burdening for some people. Therefore, when applying this effect, it is necessary to combine scenario needs and population characteristics to avoid excessive pursuit of 'zero load' and losing the vitality of the environment.
Territory effect
What is the territory effect?
Territory effect refers to the phenomenon that people will establish a 'sense of territory' by marking and controlling space and adjust their behavior according to their territorial ownership. Whether it is placing a book when the library takes up a seat or placing potted plants at the door of your house, these behaviors are all declaring 'This is my space.' Territory makes people more relaxed and more controlled in their own territory, while in other people's territory, they are more cautious and follow the rules.
Background source
This effect originated from the study of 'territorial behavior' in animal behavior, and was later introduced to human society by environmental psychologist Edward Hall. Hall proposed in his book 'Hidden Dimensions' that humans are as territorially conscious as animals, and will divide 'territorial boundaries' through physical markers, spatial layouts and even cultural customs, and react to intruders. He divided human territories into three categories: primary territories (primary territories, such as family), secondary territories (secondary territories, such as cafe seats for frequent visits), and public territories (public territories, such as park benches).
Core Principle
The core of the territorial effect is the impact of spatial belonging on psychological security. When people identify a certain space as 'your own territory', they will develop a 'sense of control' and a 'sense of belonging'. This psychological state will improve behavioral comfort and efficiency - such as being more focused when working in their study. At the same time, territorial awareness will prompt people to maintain territorial order, such as cleaning up garbage from their seats; and when entering other people's territory, people will automatically start the 'polite mode', such as paying more attention to words and deeds when visiting friends' homes, and avoiding turning over animals at will.
Experimental basis
Psychologist Robert Sommer's 'Library Seating Experiment' intuitively demonstrates the territorial effect. He observed that when readers place their schoolbags, books and other personal items on their seats, the probability of the seat being occupied by others in the next 2 hours is only 15%, while the probability of the empty seats without marks being occupied is as high as 80%. Another experiment asked subjects to complete creative tasks in their own office or in a strange office, and the results showed that subjects in their own office proposed 30% more creative programs than in a strange environment and were more positive.
Realistic application
Territory effects are widely used in architectural design and space management. In the design of office space, many companies set up fixed workstations for employees and allow personalized decorations (such as photos and green plants), which improves work satisfaction by enhancing the sense of territory; cafes place partitions and set up semi-enclosed seats to make customers feel safe as a 'temporary territory' and extend their stay time; communities enhance their sense of belonging and their willingness to maintain public spaces by setting up exclusive activity areas for residents (such as fitness corners and children's playgrounds).
Critical Analysis
Territory effects are not an absolute 'protection mechanism', and excessive territorial awareness may cause conflict. For example, there are disputes between neighbors due to the 'right to use common area' and conflicts between colleagues due to the 'workstation boundary'. These are manifestations of excessive territorial awareness. In addition, cultural differences will affect territorial expression - Eastern culture emphasizes more collective space sharing, and territorial markings are more implicit; Western culture attaches more importance to personal space and has clearer territorial boundaries. Therefore, when utilizing the territorial effect, it is necessary to balance personal belonging needs and the principle of sharing public spaces to avoid interpersonal relationship problems caused by 'territorial division'.
Summarize
These classic effects in environmental psychology reveal an important fact: the environment is not only the 'background board' of our lives, but also the 'invisible force' that shapes behavior. From the induction of environmental disorder in the broken window effect to the natural healing of psychology in the restorative effect; from the impact of environmental load on decision-making to the norm of territorial spatial behavior, each effect allows us to see the close connection between people and the environment.
Understanding these effects can not only help us explain phenomena in life—such as why neat classrooms can make students more focused, and why walking in parks can relieve stress; it can also guide us to actively optimize the environment: improve efficiency by improving space design, adjust emotions with the help of natural elements, and rationally plan public space to promote harmony. In the future, with in-depth research on environmental psychology, we will make these laws more precise and make the environment a 'help' rather than a 'resistance' to improve the quality of life.
Continue to pay attention to the series of articles in 'Complete Psychological Effects' and explore more secret weapons of psychology in depth.
Link to this article: https://m.psyctest.cn/article/M3x3Zv5o/
If the original article is reprinted, please indicate the author and the source in the form of this link.
