In today's globalization, people from different cultural backgrounds communicate more and more frequently. Cross-cultural psychology, as a discipline that studies how culture affects human psychology and behavior, provides an important perspective for us to understand these differences. Among them, the cultural initiation effect and the language relativity effect are two core effects, which reveal the deep connection between culture and cognition and thinking. This article will explain these two effects in detail to help you easily understand how culture shapes our psychological world.
Cultural Priming
What is the cultural startup effect?
The cultural initiation effect refers to when people are exposed to clues related to a specific culture (such as symbols, languages, images, etc.), they will unconsciously activate the values, thinking patterns or behavioral norms in the culture, which will in turn affect subsequent cognition, judgment and behavior. Simply put, cultural clues are like 'switches', which can quickly awaken the cultural attributes deep in your heart , allowing you to think or act according to the corresponding cultural model without realizing it.
Background source of cultural initiation effect
Early psychological research focused more on the universality of human psychology and ignored the influence of culture. Until the end of the 20th century, psychologists discovered that even people from the same group had significant differences in behavior under the stimulation of different cultural cues. In 1997, psychologist Hong Ying-yi and others systematically proposed the concept of 'cultural start-up' for the first time through a series of experiments. They found that after Chinese subjects were exposed to traditional Chinese cultural symbols (such as the Great Wall and the Dragon), they were more inclined to collectivist thinking; while after being exposed to Western cultural symbols (such as the Statue of Liberty and the Cowboy), they were more inclined to individualist thinking. This discovery has promoted the cultural initiation effect to become a research hotspot in cross-cultural psychology.
The core principle of cultural initiation effect
The core principle of the cultural initiation effect is the activation of cultural cognitive structure . Each culture has a unique 'cognitive toolbox', which contains the values advocated by the culture (such as collectivism emphasizes 'group harmony' and individualism emphasizes 'self-realization'), thinking habits (such as the overall thinking of Eastern culture, the analytical thinking of Western culture), etc. These cognitive structures may be in a 'dormant' state at ordinary times, but when they encounter corresponding cultural clues, they will be quickly activated, guiding our psychological activities like 'invisible hands'.
For example, people under collectivist culture have more likely to be activated by clues such as family photos and traditional holiday symbols. At this time, they will give priority to collective interests when making decisions; while people under individualist culture have more attention to the realization of personal goals after being exposed to clues related to 'personal achievement' (such as trophys and declaration of independence fragments).
Experimental basis for cultural initiation effect
The classic experiments of Hong Yingyi’s team provide strong support for the cultural startup effect. They selected Chinese college students who were exposed to Chinese and Western cultures at the same time as subjects and randomly divided them into three groups: the first group to view pictures of Chinese traditional culture (Great Wall, Panda), the second group to view pictures of Western culture (Story of Liberty, Hollywood logo), and the third group to view neutral pictures (Scenery photos). The subjects were then asked to complete the 'attribution task' - explaining the reasons for a person's success or failure.
The results showed that subjects exposed to Chinese cultural clues tended to attribute from external factors such as environment and interpersonal relationships (such as 'he succeeded because of team support'), which is in line with the collectivist way of thinking; while subjects exposed to Western cultural clues tended to attribute from internal factors such as personal ability and effort (such as 'he succeeded because of his intelligence', which reflects the individualistic thinking characteristics. Subsequent research also found that language is also an important clue to cultural activation: when asking questions in Chinese, Chinese people pay more attention to the collective; when asking questions in English, they pay more attention to the individual.
Realistic application of cultural initiation effect
In cross-cultural communication, rational use of cultural initiation effect can effectively improve communication efficiency. For example, when multinational companies advertise in the Chinese market, they incorporate Chinese cultural symbols such as red lanterns and Fu characters, which can quickly activate consumers' sense of cultural identity and enhance their favorability to the brand; in team management, for employees with collectivist cultural backgrounds, using collective language such as 'our team goals' and 'work together', which can more easily stimulate their willingness to cooperate.
In the field of education, if teachers want to cultivate students' collective consciousness, they can arrange cultural clues such as class photos and team certificates in the classroom; if they want to encourage students to think independently, they can display stories of celebrities independently explored or pictures of scientific inventions, and guide students' thinking direction through culture.
Critical Analysis of Cultural Initiation Effect
Although the cultural initiation effect has been supported by a lot of experiments, it also has certain limitations. First, the intensity of the effect is affected by individual cultural identity : people with strong sense of cultural identity to their own cultural identity have a more obvious effect; while people with vague cultural identity may have weak responses to cultural clues. Secondly, the influence of long-term cultural influence and temporary startup is different : cultural startup is a short-term and temporary activation, while the thinking habits formed by long-term living in a certain culture are more stable, and the initiation effect cannot be completely replaced by the initiation effect to culture to shape people.
In addition, not all cultural clues can produce a priming effect, and the 'cultural typicality' of the clues is very important. For example, using 'dumplings' as a clue of Chinese culture is effective for most Chinese people, but may not be effective for those who do not understand Chinese food culture. Therefore, in application, it is necessary to combine specific cultural backgrounds and individual differences to avoid excessive exaggeration of the role of the initiation effect.
Linguistic relative effect
What is the relativity effect of language?
The relativity effect of language, also known as the 'Sapir-Wolf hypothesis', refers to the fact that language structure affects or shapes people's thinking, cognitive habits, and perception of the world . Simply put, the language you speak may be quietly 'regulating' how you think. For example, different languages have different descriptions of time, space, and colors, and people who use these languages may also have differences in their perceptions and understanding of these concepts.
The background source of language relativity effect
The idea of this effect dates back to the 19th century, but was officially proposed in the mid-20th century. Linguist Edward Sapir and his student Benjamin Lee Whorf found a close connection between language structure and thinking patterns through research on Native American languages. Wolf observed that the description of time in Hopi (a Native American language) does not have a clear distinction between the past, present, and future, and that people who use Hopi also have different perceptions of time than those who speak English. Based on this, they proposed the hypothesis that 'language determines thinking', that is, the strong version of language relativity; later researchers corrected it and formed a weak version of 'language affects thinking', which is also a widely accepted view at present.
The core principle of language relativity effect
The core principle of the relativity effect of language is to shape the cognitive framework of language structure . As the 'tool' of human thinking, language has its vocabulary, grammar, grammatical rules and other structures that affect our classification, encoding and memory of the world. For example, vocabulary determines what we can 'note' - if there is no distinctive vocabulary between 'blue' and 'green' in a language, it may be difficult for users to quickly distinguish the two colors; grammatical rules affect our thinking focus - 'We completed the task together' is often used in Chinese, emphasizing the collective; while in English, 'I did it with my team' is more often said, highlighting the individual, and this grammatical habit will strengthen different thinking tendencies.
Simply put, language is like a 'filter', through which we perceive the world, and the color (language structure) of the filter will affect the 'picture' (thinking and cognition) we see.
Experimental basis for language relativity effect
A large number of experiments provide evidence for the relativity effect of language. The most classic is the study of color cognition: Berlin & Kay found that the number of color words in different languages is different (some languages only have 2 basic color words, and some have 11), but the user's memory and classification of colors will be affected by vocabulary. For example, in English, there are 'blue' and 'green' and English users can distinguish these two colors faster; in some languages, these two colors are represented by the same word, and the users are slower to distinguish them.
Another interesting experiment is about spatial description: 'left/right' is commonly used in English to describe positions (such as 'the cup is on the left side of the plate'), while the Caribbean language of Guyana is described in 'East/South/West/North' (such as 'the cup is on the north side of the plate'). Researchers found that Caribbean speakers can accurately judge directions even in closed spaces without external references. The spatial cognitive ability is significantly better than that of English users, which is the embodiment of the cognitive ability shaping language structures.
Realistic application of language relativity effect
In language education, understanding the relativity effect of language can help us learn foreign languages more efficiently. For example, when learning Japanese, you should pay attention to the collectivist culture reflected by its 'respective system'. Understanding the thinking mode behind the language can help you master the essence of language faster; when learning German, its rigorous grammatical structure (such as gender division of nouns) can cultivate logical thinking ability.
In cross-cultural communication, this effect reminds us to pay attention to the thinking differences caused by language differences. For example, Chinese users are accustomed to implicit expressions (such as 'maybe less convenient' implies rejection), while English users are more direct (such as 'I can't'). Understanding this kind of communication style difference caused by language habits can reduce misunderstandings and improve communication quality.
Critical Analysis of Language Relativity Effects
The relativity effect of language is not without controversy. First, the strong version of the view of 'language determines thinking' has been widely questioned : a large number of studies have shown that humans have some common cognitive abilities (such as recognition of basic emotions and simple logical reasoning) that are not affected by language. For example, no matter which language is used, people's perceptions of 'happiness' and 'sadness' are similar.
Secondly, the relationship between language and thinking is two-way : language will affect thinking, but thinking can also shape language. For example, with the development of science and technology, humans' understanding of 'artificial intelligence' has deepened, and relevant language words have been created to describe it. In addition, factors such as culture and environment will also affect thinking together with language, and cognitive differences cannot be completely attributed to language.
Therefore, we should look at this effect objectively: language is an important factor affecting thinking, but not the only factor. It together with culture and cognitive universality shapes the psychological world of human beings.
Conclusion
The cultural initiation effect allows us to see how cultural clues instantly activate specific thinking patterns, while the language relativity effect reveals the dynamic connection between language and thinking. These two major effects together prove that culture is not only an external custom and symbol, but also an 'operating system' that penetrates into the bottom of our thinking, affecting how we perceive the world, think about problems and interact with people.
Understanding these cross-cultural psychological effects can help us better understand cultural differences, reduce conflicts and enhance understanding in cross-cultural communication. Whether it is daily communication, study and work, or global cooperation, mastering these psychological knowledge can allow us to deal with cultural diversity more calmly and embrace a more inclusive world. I hope this article will give you a clearer understanding of the effects of cross-cultural psychology and embark on a new journey of exploring cultural and psychological mysteries.
Continue to pay attention to the series of articles in 'Complete Psychological Effects' and explore more secret weapons of psychology in depth.
Link to this article: https://m.psyctest.cn/article/nyGEEPGj/
If the original article is reprinted, please indicate the author and the source in the form of this link.
